Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Nebraska Journal Herald National News
NJH National is news that is relevant to the United States and is of interest to the broader public within this nation's borders.
Nebraska DOGE Report
Shared Fraud, Waste, and Abuse
The Nebraska congressional delegation consistently supported spending riddled with fraud, waste, and abuse, as uncovered by the Department of Government Efficiency. From trivial overpriced items to massive idle projects, their approvals reveal a troubling disregard for oversight. This report exposes a deeper congressional failure, leaving taxpayers with a lingering burden. Read the full article here or click the image for the video.
Watch the video that accompanies this article
Sanctuary City Mayors Grilled in House Hearing
Omaha Mayor Absent as
In a tense congressional hearing, mayors of major U.S. cities faced fierce criticism over sanctuary policies blamed for worsening an immigration crisis. Absent Omaha Mayor Jean Stothert dodged the spotlight, but her city’s leadership drew scrutiny for similar issues, amid accusations of dysfunction, corruption, and neglecting pressing local problems.
Read the full article at the Nebraska Journal Herald. Select the image to find out more.
Watch the video that accompanies this article
RFK Jr. Sworn In: A New Horizon for Health Policy
Empowering Nebraska to Lead in the Fight
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., confirmed as US Health and Human Services chief in a 52-48 vote without Democratic backing, now leads a transformative era with 80,000 employees and a trillion-dollar budget. His appointment follows the exposure of the Covid crisis as a fraud, targeting those like lawmakers, politicians, and medical professionals who pushed the harmful Covid vaccine narrative. RFK Jr. aims to rectify this by advocating for vaccine truth and health freedom, bringing accountability to the forefront. Select the image to find out more.
Watch the video that accompanies this article
Biden Pillen 2028: Making America Confused Again
In what can only be described as the political equivalent of a circus clown car pulling up to the White House, former President Joe Biden has announced his bid for the presidency in 2028, with Nebraska's very own Governor Jim Pillen as his running mate. The "Biden-Pillen 2028" ticket promises to bring a new kind of leadership to America—one where the less you know, the better you lead... Select the image to find out more.
Watch the video that accompanies this article
Exploitation of Sacred Spaces for Ideological Warfare
Woke Episcopal Priestess Lectures Trump at the National Prayer Service
The spectacle of the "woke" Episcopal priestess at the National Prayer Service is not just an isolated incident but a symptom of a broader, more troubling trend within contemporary religious leadership. This phenomenon where personal ideologies are cloaked under the sacred garb of religious authority has sparked considerable controversy, reflecting a deep-seated concern about the authenticity of modern religious leaders.
At the heart of this issue is the exploitation of the church's traditional veneer for personal gain, be it ideological, political, or even criminal. The priestess in question, whose remarks seemed more aligned with contemporary political activism than spiritual guidance, epitomizes this shift. Her presence at such a significant event was not merely a moment of progressive inclusion but rather an emblematic example of how religious platforms can be co-opted to serve agendas far removed from the core tenets of faith.
The church, historically seen as a sanctuary for spiritual comfort and ethical direction, has increasingly turned into a venue for cultural and ideological conflicts. This development underscores and critiques the overemphasis on social justice in religious contexts, questioning the appropriateness of how such themes are integrated. When a religious leader leverages their role mainly to push forward political or social agendas, it casts doubt on their authenticity as a spiritual guide. Are they truly caretakers of their congregation, or merely activists exploiting the church as their platform?
This leads to the broader, more disturbing realization that many individuals ascend to religious leadership roles under false pretenses. The sanctity of the role they assume is often overshadowed by their ulterior motives. This trend isn't limited to just one denomination or faith but is a pervasive issue across various religious landscapes. These individuals, whether they identify as "woke" or hold other ideological stances, manipulate the trust and faith of their congregations to promote views that might not align with the spiritual or doctrinal foundations of the religion they claim to serve.
Moreover, this phenomenon isn't merely about spreading ideologies. There's a darker, more insidious aspect where some religious leaders are not religious in any traditional sense. These individuals are wolves in sheep's clothing, using the mantle of religious leadership to engage in criminal activities. Under the protective cloak of religious freedom enshrined in the United States Constitution, they perpetrate fraud, abuse, and other malevolent acts.
The Constitution's guarantee of religious freedom was intended to allow for the free practice of faith without state interference, a noble and necessary right. However, this freedom has been exploited by those who see it not as a protection for spiritual practice but as a shield for criminality. From financial scams under the guise of religious fundraising to the abuse of power within the confines of religious institutions, these leaders betray the very essence of what they are supposed to represent.
This exploitation not only betrays the trust of those seeking spiritual guidance but also undermines the credibility of religious institutions as a whole. When the public eye catches these betrayals, as it inevitably does, the fallout affects all of faith, tainting the perception of religious leaders and causing widespread disillusionment. Congregants, once trusting, become skeptical; the faithful question their faith, and the secular world points to these incidents as evidence of religion's inherent hypocrisy or corruption.
The challenge, then, is not just identifying these false shepherds but also understanding the mechanisms that allow such figures to rise to prominence. Part of this lies in the sometimes lax oversight within religious bodies, where the selection and accountability of leaders might be more influenced by external pressures or internal politics than by spiritual merit. Additionally, there's the allure of power and influence that comes with religious leadership, which can attract individuals more interested in these worldly gains than in spiritual service.
Addressing this multifaceted issue requires a concerted effort from within the religious community itself. Religious institutions must strengthen their governance, implement rigorous vetting processes for leaders, and foster environments where transparency and accountability are not just preached but practiced. Education for congregants about the signs of genuine versus exploitative leadership could also serve as a safeguard against the infiltration of false prophets.
While the "woke" Episcopal priestess at the National Prayer Service might be dismissed by some as merely an example of cultural shift or progressive overreach, she stands as a stark reminder of a deeper malaise. Church congregants must be on guard against those who would use its sacred spaces and symbols not for divine worship but for personal gain or ideological battles. It is crucial for the sanctity of religious practice and the protection of the faithful that we critically examine and reform how we select, empower, and hold accountable those who claim to lead in faith.
Watch the video that accompanies this article
Trump's Return to the White House
Today marks the second inauguration of Donald J. Trump as the 47th President of the United States, a return to office after a term that was marred by inaction and mismanagement. Trump, who previously served as the 45th President, is stepping into the White House again with a mandate to rectify the failures of his first term, fueled by a personal motivation for vindication following unjust attacks on both personal and political fronts post-presidency.
In his first term, Donald Trump's commitment to erect a comprehensive border wall was largely unmet. Although some construction took place, the impact was negligible, with illegal border crossings continuing unabated throughout his presidency. Trump had the potential to swiftly deploy a substantial military force to secure the border while simultaneously building an effective wall, and to conduct widespread deportations to manage the situation. Instead, these strategies were overlooked in favor of focusing on healthcare reform and other legislative priorities, which resulted in neglecting border security.
Now, with renewed promises to complete the wall and implement mass deportations, skepticism abounds about his ability to fulfill these pledges, given his previous record. The situation is compounded by the fact that the number of illegal invaders has significantly increased, setting the stage for a challenging scenario. This immigration debacle, which should have been addressed during his initial term, is poised to become a complex issue. However, there appears to be an immediate intent to tackle this "illegal invasion" and reverse the ongoing border chaos.
Trump's slogan to "drain the swamp" was intended to signify a cleanup of corruption and inefficiency in Washington. However, his tenure saw an increase in "swamp creatures" – individuals entrenched in the political establishment. His administration failed to make a notable dent in bureaucratic waste, and significant staff transitions, notably in the FBI and the Attorney General's office, resulted in appointments of individuals who were equally or more problematic. With this new term, Trump has promised a more aggressive approach to rooting out corruption and inefficiency, potentially driven by personal vendettas against those he feels wronged him during and after his presidency.
One of the unfulfilled commitments from Trump's first campaign was to legally pursue Hillary Clinton and other Washington D.C. criminals who had long operated the government like a criminal enterprise. Despite the enthusiasm of chants and campaign promises, no legal actions were initiated against Clinton or others implicated in political misconduct during his initial term. After leaving office, Trump faced numerous legal challenges, perceived by him and his supporters as retaliatory actions. Now, back in office, there's an anticipation that he will use his executive powers to correct these perceived injustices and fulfill his earlier vow to "lock her up."
Perhaps one of the most criticized aspects of Trump's first term was his handling of the COVID-19 fake pandemic. From the outset, the crisis was labeled as fraudulent, yet Trump's response included endorsing measures like mask mandates and a vaccine rollout that were part of a broader scam. His failure to critically assess the situation from the beginning, whether due to misinformation or ulterior motives, led to widespread chaos, economic downturn, and personal hardships for many Americans. This period of governance has left a significant stain on his record, with many feeling betrayed by his initial cooperation with this hoax. As he returns to power, there is a call for him to rectify his stance, punish those involved in the deception, and move the country away from the policies and narratives of the fake pandemic.
Trump's second term begins with him acknowledging past mistakes but also with a clear agenda of revenge against those that have wronged him and the country. With no need for re-election, there's an expectation that he will be less compromising, aiming to execute his original promises with a vengeance. His administration has pledged to focus on what should have been priorities from the start: securing the border, cleaning up government inefficiencies, and pursuing legal accountability for those guilty of corruption and treason.
Despite the high hopes and promises, the skepticism is palpable. Trump's first term left the nation in a state many describe as worse off, with increased illegal immigration, a government more corrupt, and a populace disillusioned by the handling of the fake pandemic. Whether this second term will see Trump fulfill his earlier promises or repeat the patterns of his previous administration remains to be seen. Today, as he takes the oath of office again, the nation watches with cautious optimism, tempered by the memory of his first term's shortcomings.
Watch the video that accompanies this article
Trump's Return to Office Reinstates American Values
On January 20, 2025, the United States witnessed a seismic shift in policy direction as Donald Trump, resuming his role as President, unleashed a torrent of executive orders aimed at dismantling Anti-America policies established by the Biden administration. Trump's actions were not just administrative; they were a clarion call to restore the fundamental American ideals of liberty, freedom, and national sovereignty. From immigration to energy policy, from cultural values to economic regulations, Trump's first day in office was marked by a clear intent to redefine America's domestic and international posture, aiming to unshackle the nation from overreaching government control and ideological impositions.
Trump's immediate declaration of a national emergency at the U.S.-Mexico border underscored his commitment to securing the nation's borders. The end of "catch and release" and the resumption of border wall construction were presented as measures to restore control over who enters America, protecting the country from an uncontrolled influx of illegal immigrants. The "Remain in Mexico" policy was reinstated to ensure only genuine asylum claims would be processed, reducing system abuse. However, this measure didn't go far enough, as new asylum claims should not be processed until all the fake asylum seekers are removed from the country. By designating criminal cartels as terrorist organizations and challenging birthright citizenship, Trump aimed to safeguard American citizenship and cultural identity, taking these steps as essential to upholding the nation's laws and traditions.
Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement was seen as a liberation from international constraints on American industry. By declaring a national energy emergency, he sought to cut through red tape, empowering domestic energy production. This would lead to energy independence, bolster economic growth, and put American interests first, reducing reliance on foreign energy sources and promoting jobs within the U.S.
DEI initiatives, also known as "Didn't Earn It," which gives unearned benefits to certain groups, like the blacks, led Donald Trump to sign an executive order aimed at ending Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs within the federal government. Trump positioned himself as a defender of meritocracy against divisive equity measures. By ending these programs, he aimed to shift focus back to individual achievements rather than group identity. His policy recognizing only two biological sexes was seen as a stand against "woke" ideology, protecting traditional values and biological realities in federal documentation.
Trump's moves to freeze federal regulations, impose a hiring freeze, and reinstate "Schedule F" were portrayed as efforts to make government more accountable and efficient. The establishment of the "Department of Government Efficiency" was intended to streamline government operations, reducing waste and enhancing freedom by minimizing governmental interference in private lives.
The pardons issued for those involved in the January 6th events were a long-overdue correction to the unjust imprisonment of individuals by the Biden administration, which was motivated by political vendettas. These pardons underscored Trump's emphasis on the right to free speech and protest. Trump argued that these actions were essential to restore balance to a justice system that has been weaponized against political dissent.
Trump's rescinding of numerous Biden-era executive actions was seen as a move to liberate businesses from regulatory constraints, fostering an environment where economic liberty could flourish. His focus on inflation through a presidential memorandum was presented as a direct response to the financial pressures felt by American citizens, aiming for economic stability.
Trump's executive order to end "wokeness" in the military directly criticized the current military leadership for a descent into political correctness rather than combat readiness. He accused leaders of prioritizing diversity training and environmental concerns over traditional military values and operational effectiveness. This move was framed as a necessary purge of ideologies that had weakened the military's core mission. By targeting these policies, Trump aimed to restore a focus on merit, discipline, and national defense, suggesting that recent military leadership had lost sight of these fundamental principles in favor of social agendas.
Donald Trump's first day back in office was marked by an audacious effort to undo policies that are considered detrimental to American ideals. His executive actions were not merely administrative but symbolic, aiming to restore a vision of America where liberty, freedom, and national sovereignty are paramount. This was seen by his supporters as a long-awaited return to what they consider the true essence of America. As these policies begin to take effect, the nation will watch closely to see if they indeed restore the liberty and freedom Trump promises or if more aggressive executive orders are needed to target problem areas. Regardless, Trump's first day set the tone for a presidency intent on reshaping America, contrasting with the policies of the previous administration.
Watch the video that accompanies this article
The Sickness of Public Pensions - A System Ripe for Revolt
Reform or Bust: The Unsustainable Pension System Facing Reform or Collapse
Public pensions are an outrage, a blatant rip-off where employees, often seen as the dregs of the labor market, milk the system dry after a mere 20 years. "Didn't earn it and don't deserve it" isn't just a catchy phrase; it's a stark reality. These public servants aren't just collecting a pension; they're getting a golden parachute while taxpayers foot the bill. Imagine retiring at 40 with a pension that could last until you're 100! It's not just unfair; it's economic insanity.
The government, in its infinite wisdom, keeps hiring more of these 'pension poopers' to pay for those already retired. It's a vicious cycle, a multi-level marketing scheme with no product, just endless outgoing money. The public sector becomes a bloated, self-sustaining monster, driving up labor costs and leaving private sector workers paying for a lavish retirement they can only dream of.
This must end. The pensions are not just unsustainable; they're an affront to every working person who has to keep laboring into their golden years. Public pensioners need to get back to work or find another job because it's high time they contribute instead of just consuming. Public pensions? You can eat them because the rest of us are sick of paying for your lifetime of leisure.
Moms Trade Kids' Health for Social Media Likes
The Dark Side of Digital Parenting: Vaccines for Validation
In the age of social media, where "likes" dictate self-worth, a peculiar trend emerged: moms vaccinating their kids with the "poison covid vaccine" not for health, but for virtual validation. These mothers, in their quest for digital applause, displayed a profound misunderstanding of both parenting and science. Their children, often seen screaming and crying in these shared images, were mere pawns in a game of social media popularity, where the currency was likes, not love or concern.
The irony is stark. These mothers, blinded by the allure of online affirmation, ignored the experimental nature of the shot, its unproven long-term effects, and the potential harm it might bring to their children. Instead, they celebrated their "parenting achievements" with posts, inadvertently showcasing their neglect of genuine care for a fleeting moment of digital fame.
Now, as they see the truth about the vaccine's efficacy and safety, these same mothers scramble to erase the evidence of their folly from the Internet. They've realized too late that the vaccine was not the safeguard they boasted about but a source of harm. Their children, now possibly facing adverse effects, are the silent victims of this vanity.
The digital age has indeed transformed parenting into performance art, where the health and well-being of one's offspring are traded for likes, comments, and shares. These mothers, in their misguided pursuit, have left a legacy of regret, unable to delete the real damage they've caused, only the digital traces of their misplaced priorities.
2+2=?
Parents vs. Teachers: Reclaiming Education from Emotional Do
Amidst a polarized educational landscape, parents are pushing back against what they see as emotional indoctrination in schools. They demand transparency to ensure their children's learning focuses on academic excellence and critical thinking, not ideological conformity. Concerns arise over curricula that seem to prioritize social agendas, potentially stunting student development and individuality. Parents champion a return to basics—reading, writing, and independent thinking—arguing that education should equip children for the future, not dictate their emotions or beliefs. This isn't merely a content dispute but a fundamental disagreement on education's purpose: to foster well-rounded individuals or to mold them into a preconceived worldview. The battle for control over what our children learn, and how, continues.
Christmas Eve Shopping Guide to Last-Minute Christmas Gift
It's the night before Christmas, and all through the house, not a creature is stirring... because they're all at the corner store, frantically grabbing whatever's left. Here's your guide to last-minute gifts that'll make you look like you planned this all along:
Bottled Water: Nothing says "I love you" like hydration. Gift them a case of water with a note saying, "Stay hydrated, because this holiday will be as dry as my sense of humor." It's practical, thoughtful, and environmentally... questionable.
Travel-Sized Toothpaste: For that special someone who's always on the go (or maybe just always forgetting to buy toothpaste). "Merry Christmas! Here's to fresh starts and fresh breaths. Use it before the relatives arrive."
Lighters: Because everyone knows someone who's always "borrowing" lighters. Package it with a note, "Light up your life, but keep this one. I know you won't." It's the gift that keeps on giving... back.
Mystery Meat Jerky: Found in the darkest corner of the store, this jerky has no clear origin but a lot of flavor. "Here's to survival, because this jerky has seen more than Santa on Christmas Eve."
Novelty Ice Scraper: Perfect for the person who's always late, especially in winter. "Scrape away your procrastination with this handy tool. Or just use it to clear your windshield after you've been sitting in your car, waiting for the ice to melt."
Expired Coupons: Collect all the expired coupons from the store's coupon rack. "Here's to saving money... next year! Because who needs current savings when you can laugh about what could've been?"
Single-Use Cameras: A nostalgic throwback or a reminder to capture the moment – any moment – because you didn't bother to capture any during the year. "Merry Christmas! Here's your chance to document the aftermath of your gift-giving."
And finally, A Lottery Ticket: The ultimate procrastinator's gift. "Here's hoping for a better financial decision than this last-minute shopping spree. Good luck!"
So, as you wander aimlessly through the aisles of your local convenience store, remember: Laughter is the best gift you can give, especially when it's paired with the most random items you can find. Merry Christmas, fellow last-minute shoppers – may your gifts be as forgettable as your shopping strategy.
Watch the video that accompanies this article
Christmas Covid Cautions
Preparing for Advent in a Post-Fake Pandemic Era
The Fourth Sunday of Advent, the time we prepare for the joyous arrival of Jesus... and the annual return of our collective paranoia over invisible germs. This year, as we light the candles of hope, peace, joy, and love, we're also dusting off our masks, sanitizers, and our Zoom accounts, because, we can't be too careful with all these "new" pandemics that keep popping up like holiday decorations.
At one time, Advent was about preparing for Christ's birth. Now, it's also about preparing for another round of "Pretending We Still might be in a Crisis." Virtual Celebrations are back because, Jesus would approve of us celebrating his birth through a screen.
This Sunday should be all about peace, love, joy, and hope. But let's not forget the new commandments at Outdoor Gatherings where we can shout carols into N95 masks, because nothing says 'Silent Night' like Filtration Efficiency.
Advent traditionally calls for introspection, but now we're also reflecting on whether we've sanitized enough. Masking and Hygiene are the new sacraments. Because nothing says "I love my neighbor" like hiding behind a mask and six feet of separation at the communal meal.
We used to gather in churches, but now we gather in our living rooms, checking for symptoms before we dare to sing. Testing and Symptom Checks are the new way to show we care, ensuring our community gatherings don't turn into super-spreader events.
The Advent wreath now symbolizes not just the coming of Christ but our commitment to air quality. Ventilation and Air Quality are the unsung heroes, ensuring no one catches anything more than the Christmas spirit.
This Advent, let's embrace our dual roles as faithful followers and cautious cynics. Here's to celebrating the birth of Jesus with one eye on heaven and the other on our health apps, because if there's one thing we've learned, it's that you can never be too prepared for a crisis... real or imagined. Merry Christmas, and may your gatherings be both holy and hygienic.
Democrats' Comeback Plan
Reclaiming Education from Emotional Doctrine
Reclaiming Education from Emotional Doctrine
After the unexpected 2024 election loss, Democrats are reeling but regrouping. Despite their strategy of open borders leading to increased crime rates, they're baffled at the lack of voter support. Their solution? Double down on immigration. The party's new plan involves quietly increasing illegal entries to bolster their voter base, essentially ignoring laws to maintain this influx. Critics argue this strategy undermines national security and legal integrity, prioritizing political gain over public safety. Democrats, however, see this as a pathway to reclaim power, believing that more immigrants equate to more votes, regardless of the societal cost .
Reclaiming Education from Emotional Doctrine
Reclaiming Education from Emotional Doctrine
Reclaiming Education from Emotional Doctrine
Amidst a polarized educational landscape, parents are pushing back against what they see as emotional indoctrination in schools. They demand transparency to ensure their children's learning focuses on academic excellence and critical thinking, not ideological conformity. Concerns arise over curricula that seem to prioritize social agendas, potentially stunting student development and individuality. Parents champion a return to basics—reading, writing, and independent thinking—arguing that education should equip children for the future, not dictate their emotions or beliefs. This isn't merely a content dispute but a fundamental disagreement on education's purpose: to foster well-rounded individuals or to mold them into a preconceived worldview. The battle for control over what our children learn, and how, continues.
Blacklash Against Unmerited Flavoritism
Reclaiming Education from Emotional Doctrine
Trump's Choice for HHS Secretary Rattles Big Pharma
Across America, "DEI" or "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion" has morphed in public perception to "Didn't Earn It." A widespread fatigue has set in as many believe these policies disproportionately benefit a minority group, often at the expense of meritocracy. Critics argue that DEI initiatives foster a culture where hard work is overshadowed by race-based preferences, leading to resentment among those who feel their opportunities have been unfairly diminished. There's a growing sentiment that these programs, instead of fostering equality, have created a dependency mindset, encouraging louder demands for unearned privileges. As Americans push back, seeking fairness in employment and opportunities, the debate over DEI's role in society intensifies, with many advocating for a return to merit-based systems.
Trump's Choice for HHS Secretary Rattles Big Pharma
Controversial Rant in Congress Sparks Debate on DEI Policies
Trump's Choice for HHS Secretary Rattles Big Pharma
Donald Trump's decision to appoint Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services has sent shockwaves through the pharmaceutical industry. Known for his skepticism towards big pharma, RFK Jr.'s appointment signals a potential overhaul in how the industry might be regulated. Historically, the HHS has been perceived as lenient towards pharmaceutical giants. Kennedy's tenure could usher in a new era of scrutiny, with powers to replace current administrators, potentially those seen as too accommodating to the industry. This move could challenge the status quo, aiming to curb what many see as pharmaceutical overreach and unethical practices.
Controversial Rant in Congress Sparks Debate on DEI Policies
Controversial Rant in Congress Sparks Debate on DEI Policies
Controversial Rant in Congress Sparks Debate on DEI Policies
In a recent heated session on Capitol Hill, a nasty black female representative delivered an unhinged and controversial speech about D E I, (Didn't Earn It), policies. With a loud voice that filled the chamber, she expressed frustration over what she perceives as systemic oppression, decrying the lack of opportunities for black folk, which she linked to the dismantling of D E I handouts. Her comments took a sharp turn as she voiced resentment towards White colleagues, suggesting that D E I should serve as a mechanism to get them White people money up in here, even at the cost of fairness. The speech has ignited a fiery debate on anti-White racial inequity and the ethics of D E I, leaving many to question the direction of such policies in America.
Candidate Withdraws Amid Fabricated Controversy
Controversial Rant in Congress Sparks Debate on DEI Policies
Controversial Rant in Congress Sparks Debate on DEI Policies
Florida Representative Matt Gaetz has withdrawn his candidacy for U.S. Attorney General, citing overwhelming pressure from Democrats as his reason for stepping down. Critics argue that the accusations against Gaetz, which include fabrications about his past, are part of a deliberate smear campaign by Democrats. Despite the absence of evidence supporting these claims, the political pressure led to his withdrawal, raising concerns about political tactics used in nomination processes. Supporters of Gaetz feel he should not have resisted, urging Republicans to stand firm against such strategies. This episode underscores the contentious nature of political nominations in the current climate.